Same trench
I build on Supabase, Next.js and Stripe too. I test the exact stack you ship on — not a textbook version of it.
About
I've been building SaaS for 4 years — several launched, automations for infopreneurs, on the same stack as most of my clients: Supabase, Next.js, Stripe. I don't parachute in from the outside; I code in the same trench. For the past 2 years I've pentested SaaS, only with written authorization.
Why me
I'm not a generalist pentester with a diploma. I'm a founder who pentests other founders. I've audited 170+ SaaS — small products and ones built by real teams alike, dev budgets from $20k to $200k. The budget tells you nothing about exposure: 96% had a critical vulnerability, because the modern stack generates the holes mechanically, no matter how serious the team.
The dangerous belief
That's exactly the most dangerous belief there is. Across 170+ SaaS I've audited, 96% had a critical vulnerability — including products built for up to $200k. Your dev budget says nothing about your exposure: the stack generates the holes regardless of how good the team is. A clean, fast, beautiful app can have its database wide open.
How I work
I build on Supabase, Next.js and Stripe too. I test the exact stack you ship on — not a textbook version of it.
Your tools ship an app that works, not one that's protected. Nobody warns you about the difference. I do.
I only test what you own and explicitly authorize, in writing. No exceptions, ever.
No 80-page PDF of scanner noise. Clear findings, real proof, and fixes you can ship this week.
Every critical comes with a working proof — like pulling your own customer list — so there's no debate about severity.
Scoped access, careful handling, and everything deleted when the engagement ends.
Give me your scope and written go-ahead. I'll show you what an attacker reaches first — and if I find no critical vulnerability, the Zero-Leak audit is free.